European Court Rules Against the Sikh Turban in French Schools
Posted in ICHRA

“Today is the day, 264 years ago, when a Sikh martyr, Bhai Taru Singh, was scalped alive, by the oppressive rulers of the day, because he refused to give up his faith that required him to wear his hair unshorn. Ironically, today, our lawyers learnt that the European Court of Human Rights has dismissed Jasvir Singh’s right to wear his religiously mandated turban to school, denying him a right to practice his faith,”:Mejindarpal Kaur, UNITED SIKHS legal director

“Sikhs are striving for a society in which all faiths coexist in harmony, where the expression of religion and culture is a celebration of diversity. By contrast, the Court’s decision allows states to suppress expressions of religious diversity, apparently as a means of promoting peace. It is a depressingly negative view of the state’s role in promoting religious tolerance. The UN Human Rights Committee, which is also considering this issue, has called on France to justify its ban on the wearing of religious signs.”: Stephen Grosz, UNITED SIKHS London based lawyer.

STRASBOURG, France: The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) dismissed last month the first legal challenge, since France passed a law in 2004 banning religious signs in schools, filed by UNITED SIKHS on behalf of Jasvir Singh. The decision, against which there is no leave to appeal, and which was communicated to UNITED SIKHS lawyers today, has strengthened the resolve of the Sikh community globally to rise to the challenge and defy odds to regain their right. The Court, without requiring France to respond to Jasvir Singh’s legal arguments, has following the decision it made last November in the Islamic headscarf physical education cases (which pre-dated the 2004 law), by ruling that the ban on turbans is a proportionate response to the aims of protection of the rights and freedoms of others and the protection of public order.

Jasvir Singh wearing his discreet Keski

UNITED SIKHS filed, last December, another legal challenge before the United Nations Human Rights Committee on behalf of Bikramjit Singh, who was expelled from the school with Jasvir Singh when they refused to remove their turban in school. France has filed a response to Bikramjit’s claim and our lawyers are preparing a reply.

Jasvir Singh was 14 years old when he, along with two other Sikh students, was expelled from Michel High School in Bobigny for wearing a keski. The keski is a small, discreet piece of cloth, which acts as an under-turban, covering the unshorn hair that is considered sacred in the Sikh religion. It is frequently worn by young Sikhs as a prelude, or as an alternative, to wearing a larger turban.

In the appeal filed to the ECtHR, UNITED SIKHS lawyers had argued that the 2004 law interfered with Jasvir’s human rights in a way that was disproportionate to the aim of the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. The lawyers added, that there was no pressing social need which dictated that members of the very small Sikh minority in France should not be able to wear a discreet head-covering. Moreover, a Sikh’s uncut hair is a much more conspicuous sign of adherence to the Sikh religion than the keski which covers it. Accordingly, requiring a Sikh pupil to remove his keski, revealing his uncut hair tied in a tress knot, makes his religious affiliation more conspicuous rather than less.

The principal of the high school had asked Jasvir to stop wearing the keski to school, but he declined to do so because it represents a fundamental aspect of his religion, beliefs, and identity. Jasvir was initially removed from the classroom and made to sit in a separate study area in order to pursue his education. He was placed in the school canteen, where he undertook self-study and was provided with educational materials by a teaching assistant if he requested them. No teacher taught him during the period of three weeks that he spent in the canteen. This separation continued for three weeks before he was excluded from school altogether.

Commenting on the decision, Mejindarpal Kaur, UNITED SIKHS Director for International Civil and Human Rights Advocacy stated, “Today is the day, 264 years ago, when a Sikh martyr, Bhai Taru Singh, was scalped alive by the oppressive rulers of the day because he refused to give up his faith that required him to wear his hair unshorn. Today our lawyers learnt that the European Court of Human Rights has dismissed Jasvir Singh’s right to wear his religiously mandated turban to school, denying him a right to practice his faith.”

“Yet we have faith that we will win the battle to win the hearts and minds of the French government,” she added. You may read an unofficial translation of the judgment here.

Jasvir Singh’s London Lawyer, Stephen Grosz of Bindmans LLP stated, Sikhs are striving for a society in which all faiths coexist in harmony, where the expression of religion and culture is a celebration of diversity. By contrast, the Court’s decision allows states to suppress expressions of religious diversity, apparently as a means of promoting peace. It is a depressingly negative view of the state’s role in promoting religious tolerance.”

Commenting on Bikramjit Singh’s case before the UN Human Rights Committee, he added, “The UN Human Rights Committee, which is also considering this issue, has called on France to justify its ban on the wearing of religious signs.”

Comments from Sikh leaders on this judgment

Singh Sahib Gurbachan Singh Ji, Jathedar Sri Akal Takhat Sahib, head of the 400 year old temporal seat of 25 million Sikhs globally: “This decision has hit the Sikh community in a much bigger way than France has gained from it. Sikhs have always defended the rights of others by making the ultimate sacrifice. Now the time has come for us to turn to all religious leaders to work together to put an end to this attack on religious freedom. The leaders of all the five Takhat are meeting at the Akal Takhat on 20th July when we will take a decision on the way forward.”

Avtar Singh President, Shromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committe (SGPC), the largest elected body of Sikhs: “The solution now is at the political level. We have left no stone unturned to achieve a result through the courts and diplomatically. There is no choice for Sikhs except to turn to the Indian Prime Minister to do the right thing.”

Paramjit Singh, President, Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee (DSGMC) “We will fight the decision politically through the Indian Government. If the French government can honour the turban wearing Indian PM during their national day parade recently, we must surely be able to convince them that the Court’s decision cannot stand.”

Gurdial Singh, a French Sikh community leader and father of Jasvir Singh, bitterly disappointed with the decision, said: “The judges didn’t listen to the voice of their souls or humanity when making this political decision. They will regret one day that they have made a grave mistake by hurting humanity and snatching away from a peace loving community their right to practice their faith. On our part, the battle continues.”

Kuldip Singh, UNITED SIKHS President: “The Sikh community will have to respond with all its strength. You don’t have to be a numerical majority to bring change through social politics. Guru Nanak was in the minority when he preached love for humanity to the majority communities of his day,” he added, dismissing any doubts that France will take Sikhs seriously.

Dr. Pritpal Singh, Coordinator, American Gurudwara Prabandhak Committee: “We condemn the judgment. We call upon all human rights organizations to stand by us. As Americans, we will seek a meeting with the Secretary of State to seek her help to make our case to the French government that we are peace loving people whose identity is under attack.”

Jassi Singh Khangura, MLA, elected representative of the Panjab state assembly: I am very disappointed with the European court’s decision, coming in the 21st Century, on behalf of a developed country. The Punjab assembly has passed a resolution in favour of fighting for the turban and we will carry on fighting. There are strong economic ties between India and France and we will lobby through them. It is time to move the Sikh youth globally who will have to move French youths, the future decision makers in France.”

Kashmir Singh, a French Sikh community leader: “The judges have shown themselves to be partial by not requiring France to reply to our case. The French government knows that the turban is part of the Sikh identity. We should work with politicians in the USA, Canada and the UK to bring a change of heart in France. In the in the end, we will change the law.”

You may read a previous UNITED SIKHS’ press release on the Right to Turban campaign at: https://www.unitedsikhs.org/PressReleases/PRSRLS-15-12-2008-00.htm


Issued by:
Rishipal Singh
Director, International Civil and Human Rights Advocacy
UNITED SIKHS
Ph: +44 7709830442

Start typing and press Enter to search

Shopping Cart
news-1701

yakinjp

yakinjp

rtp yakinjp

yakinjp

yakinjp

yakin jp

yakinjp id

maujp

maujp

maujp

\

sabung ayam online

sabung ayam online

SLOT MAHJONG

sabung ayam online

article 0000021

article 0000022

article 0000023

article 0000024

article 0000025

article 0000026

article 0000027

article 0000028

article 0000029

article 0000030

article 0000031

article 0000032

article 0000033

article 0000034

article 0000035

article 0000036

article 0000037

article 0000038

article 0000039

article 0000040

article 0000041

article 0000042

article 0000043

article 0000044

article 0000045

article 0000046

article 0000047

article 0000048

article 0000049

article 0000050

perkara 0000052

perkara 0000053

perkara 0000054

perkara 0000055

perkara 0000056

perkara 0000057

perkara 0000058

perkara 0000059

perkara 0000060

perkara 0000061

perkara 0000062

perkara 0000063

perkara 0000064

perkara 0000065

perkara 0000066

perkara 0000067

perkara 0000068

perkara 0000069

perkara 0000070

perkara 0000071

perkara 0000072

perkara 0000073

perkara 0000074

perkara 0000075

perkara 0000076

perkara 0000077

perkara 0000078

perkara 0000079

perkara 0000080

pengadilan 000051

pengadilan 000052

pengadilan 000053

pengadilan 000054

pengadilan 000055

pengadilan 000056

pengadilan 000057

pengadilan 000058

pengadilan 000059

pengadilan 000060

pengadilan 000061

pengadilan 000062

pengadilan 000063

pengadilan 000064

pengadilan 000065

pengadilan 000066

pengadilan 000067

pengadilan 000068

pengadilan 000069

pengadilan 000070

pengadilan 000071

pengadilan 000072

pengadilan 000073

pengadilan 000074

pengadilan 000075

pengadilan 000076

pengadilan 000077

pengadilan 000078

pengadilan 000079

pengadilan 000080

artikel 000000071

artikel 000000072

artikel 000000073

artikel 000000074

artikel 000000075

artikel 000000076

artikel 000000077

artikel 000000078

artikel 000000079

artikel 000000080

artikel 000000081

artikel 000000082

artikel 000000083

artikel 000000084

artikel 000000085

artikel 000000086

artikel 000000087

artikel 000000088

artikel 000000089

artikel 000000090

artikel 000000091

artikel 000000092

artikel 000000093

artikel 000000094

artikel 000000095

artikel 000000096

artikel 000000097

artikel 000000098

artikel 000000099

artikel 000000100

artikel 000000101

artikel 000000102

artikel 000000103

artikel 000000104

artikel 000000105

artikel 000000106

artikel 000000107

artikel 000000108

artikel 000000109

artikel 000000110

artikel 000000111

artikel 000000112

artikel 000000113

artikel 000000114

artikel 000000115

artikel 000000116

artikel 000000117

artikel 000000118

artikel 000000119

artikel 000000120

pemohonan 000001

pemohonan 000002

pemohonan 000003

pemohonan 000004

pemohonan 000005

pemohonan 000006

pemohonan 000007

pemohonan 000008

pemohonan 000009

pemohonan 000010

pemohonan 000011

pemohonan 000012

pemohonan 000013

pemohonan 000014

pemohonan 000015

pemohonan 000016

pemohonan 000017

pemohonan 000018

pemohonan 000019

pemohonan 000020

pemohonan 000021

pemohonan 000022

pemohonan 000023

pemohonan 000024

pemohonan 000025

pemohonan 000026

pemohonan 000027

pemohonan 000028

pemohonan 000029

pemohonan 000030

article 00000011

article 00000012

article 00000013

article 00000014

article 00000015

article 00000016

article 00000017

article 00000018

article 00000019

article 00000020

article 00000021

article 00000022

article 00000023

article 00000024

article 00000025

article 00000026

article 00000027

article 00000028

article 00000029

article 00000030

article 00000031

article 00000032

article 00000033

article 00000034

article 00000035

article 00000036

article 00000037

article 00000038

article 00000039

article 00000040

article 00000041

article 00000042

article 00000043

article 00000044

article 00000045

article 00000046

article 00000047

article 00000048

article 00000049

article 00000050

article 00000051

article 00000052

article 00000053

article 00000054

article 00000055

article 00000056

article 00000057

article 00000058

article 00000059

article 00000060

pusdataru 00010

pusdataru 00011

pusdataru 00012

pusdataru 00013

pusdataru 00014

pusdataru 00015

pusdataru 00016

pusdataru 00017

pusdataru 00018

pusdataru 00019

pusdataru 00020

pusdataru 00021

pusdataru 00022

pusdataru 00023

pusdataru 00024

pusdataru 00025

pusdataru 00026

pusdataru 00027

pusdataru 00028

pusdataru 00029

pusdataru 00030

pusdataru 00031

pusdataru 00032

pusdataru 00033

pusdataru 00034

pusdataru 00035

pusdataru 00036

pusdataru 00037

pusdataru 00038

pusdataru 00039

pusdataru 00040

pusdataru 00041

pusdataru 00042

pusdataru 00043

pusdataru 00044

pusdataru 00045

pusdataru 00046

pusdataru 00047

pusdataru 00048

pusdataru 00049

pusdataru 00050

pusdataru 00051

pusdataru 00052

pusdataru 00053

pusdataru 00054

pusdataru 00055

pusdataru 00056

pusdataru 00057

pusdataru 00058

pusdataru 00059

pusdataru 00060

article 2000001

article 2000002

article 2000003

article 2000004

article 2000005

article 2000006

article 2000007

article 2000008

article 2000009

article 2000010

article 2000011

article 2000012

article 2000013

article 2000014

article 2000015

article 2000016

article 2000017

article 2000018

article 2000019

article 2000020

article 2000021

article 2000022

article 2000023

article 2000024

article 2000025

article 2000026

article 2000027

article 2000028

article 2000029

article 2000030

article 2000031

article 2000032

article 2000033

article 2000034

article 2000035

article 2000036

article 2000037

article 2000038

article 2000039

article 2000040

article 2000041

article 2000042

article 2000043

article 2000044

article 2000045

article 2000046

article 2000047

article 2000048

article 2000049

article 2000050

article 2000051

article 2000052

article 2000053

article 2000054

article 2000055

article 2000056

article 2000057

article 2000058

article 2000059

article 2000060

invoice 00016

invoice 00017

invoice 00018

invoice 00019

invoice 00020

invoice 00021

invoice 00022

invoice 00023

invoice 00024

invoice 00025

invoice 00026

invoice 00027

invoice 00028

invoice 00029

invoice 00030

invoice 00031

invoice 00032

invoice 00033

invoice 00034

invoice 00035

invoice 00036

invoice 00037

invoice 00038

invoice 00039

invoice 00040

invoice 00041

invoice 00042

invoice 00043

invoice 00044

invoice 00045

news-1701