Posted in ICHRA

“A travesty of Justice against the Sikh community”: Mejindarpal Kaur, UNITED SIKHS legal director

“This decision will not legally affect the fight which UNITED SIKHS will be pursuing for other ID cases through the UN Human Rights Committee, as the Committee is not bound by the decision of the European Court of Human Rights. Additionally, the UN Human Rights Committee has traditionally been much more receptive to cases of religious discrimination than the Strasburg Court. We hope that tendency will continue.”: Stephen Grosz, UNITED SIKHS London based lawyer.

<< Jean-Paul Costa, president of the European Court of Human
Rights, a staunch French secularist, who was one of the 7 judges
who made the decision.

STRASBOURG, France: The European Court of Human Rights dismissed a legal challenge last week to the French law banning the wearing of the turban on ID document photos, filed by UNITED SIKHS on behalf of Shingara Mann Singh. The decision, communicated to UNITED SIKHS lawyers today, has shocked the Sikh community globally, that the Court, without requiring France to respond to Shingara Singh’s legal arguments, has justified denying religious freedom on the basis of public security and protection of public order. UNITED SIKHS is filing cases before the United Nations Human Rights Committee next month on behalf of Shingara Singh and Ranjit Singh for ID photographs on their passport and residence card, respectively.

French regulations require motorists to appear “bareheaded and facing forward” in their driver’s licence photographs. Shingara Singh is a 53 year old Sikh from the northern Paris suburbs, whose replacement driver’s licence was refused by the French authorities in 2005 and again in 2006. Sikhs are required to wear the dastaar (Sikh turban) at all times. Commenting on the decision, Mejindarpal Kaur, UNITED SIKHS Director for International Civil and Human Rights Advocacy stated, “We submitted three compelling arguments before the European Court of Human Rights: Firstly, that European Commission regulations do not require a bare head as a minimum requirement for other ID docs e.g. a passport because of the advent of biometrics; secondly, that a Sikh wears a dastaar (Sikh turban) at all times and hence is only identifiable with his turban and thirdly, that there is no evidence that the Sikh turban poses a security threat as evidenced by the fact that France allows Sikhs of other nationalities to travel through France with ID photographs displaying the turban on their driver’s licences and passports.””This decision is a travesty of justice against the Sikh community which views the Court’s decision as perverse because the Court did not require a response from France before issuing a decision that deeply interferes with a Sikh’s basic religious rights,” she added. You may read an excerpt of the translated judgment here.Shingara Singh’s London Lawyer, Stephen Grosz of Bindmans[] LLP stated, “The Court’s approach is very disappointing. Whilst it recognized that requiring a Sikh to remove his turban is an interference with his religious rights, the Court was quite wrong to justify that removal of the turban as necessary for identification. In particular, identifying a Sikh who wears a turban at all times, with an ID photograph of the Sikh without the turban just does not accord to common sense. The issue is serious enough to demand the French government to justify this restriction, which the Court did not.”Commenting on the upcoming filings on behalf of Shingara Singh and Ranjit Singh in regard to the denial of the renewal of their passport and residence card unless they remove their turban for their ID photographs, Mr. Grosz commented, “This decision will not legally affect the fight which UNITED SIKHS will be pursuing through the UN Human Rights Committee, as the Committee is not bound by the decision of the European Court of Human Rights. Additionally, the UN Human Rights Committee has traditionally been much more receptive to cases of religious discrimination than the Strasburg Court. We hope this tendency will continue.”
 
Comments from Sikh leaders on this judgment
Chain Singh, President of Bobigny Gurdwara, the largest Sikh place of worship in France: “We are living under duress under French law. Our children who are citizens of France cannot get education with their identity intact. What’s our future in France? We are deeply shocked. Our future is in the hands of the Sikh Qaum (community) now more than ever. The Sikh Qaum has to now decide the future of Sikhs globally.Gurdial Singh, who has been in the forefront of the Right to Turban campaign in France said, “This has come as a rude shock to us. We thought that we would get justice in the European court. This decision is a violation of religious freedom. This is the start of European fundamentalism. But I have full faith that the Guru will defend the Turban, if he wants us to continue wearing his turban. We are the foot-soldiers; the Guru is the general and will give us victory eventually”.Raghbir Singh: Member of Bobigny Gurdwara: This is shocking news. We had great hopes from the European Court, which has been crushed by this decision. This shows that the European Court is partial towards the French Government.Kashmir Singh, a member of the French Sikh community: I am shocked to hear this! On the one hand President Sarkozy said on his visit to India that the turban is not banned in France and that Sikhs are free to practise their religion. But where is the freedom after today’s decision?Dr. Pritpal Singh, Coordinator, American Gurudwara Prabandhak Committee “This judgment is a rude shock. They have cut us out from the tree of justice completely”Gurbax Singh Malhi, MP, Canada: “Sikhs should globally decide what the way forward should be. Sikhs are peace-loving hardworking and their turban should not be perceived as a security threat.Bhai Amrik Singh, Chair of the Sikh Federation (UK) speaking from Southampton said: ‘Whilst the decision by the European Court of Human Rights is hugely disappointing Sikhs will continue to challenge this discrimination. We will continue to exert political pressure so the Sikh identity is properly protected throughout Europe. The new pan-European credit card-style driving licence will begin in 2013 and we have in the past been given assurances by certain Members of the European Parliament (MEP) that photographs of Sikhs whilst wearing their turbans will be allowed for the new driving licence. In light of the Court’s decision we will have to maintain pressure on the MEPs on this issue.

Seriously disappointed by the decision, Shingara Singh commented, “If we can’t get justice from the European Court of Human Rights, who else can we expect justice from in Europe? We pin our hopes now on the UN Human Rights Committee before which my passport case will be filed next month. I am shocked that the European

Shingara Singh

Human Rights Court didn’t require France to respond to the submissions made by my lawyers who had argued why my turban is not a security threat.” Commenting further on the issue, he stated, “My business, my personal life are all affected. I now have no passport, no driving licence and my old-style ID card is not being accepted by my bank, which has refused to give me a loan because I lack valid identification. The Court’s judgment is oppression against the Sikh community because a Sikh is mandated by his faith to wear a turban at all times. The Court clearly has not recognised what the turban means to a Sikh. The Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC), the Sikh mini-Parliament, has a duty to launch a global awareness campaign about Sikhs. Equally, the Punjab State Government should intervene in this matter.”

Kuldip Singh, UNITED SIKHS president said, “The Sikh community, small but significant, has found itself to be at the brunt of security laws since 9/11. We have and will continue to fight the injustice faced by Sikhs and other minorities who are being denied religious freedom while the world grapples with its insecurity.”

You may read a previous UNITED SIKHS’ press release on the Right to Turban campaign at: https://unitedsikhs.org/belgian-court-overturns-ban-on-sikh-headcovering-in-school/

Issued By:
Jaspreet Singh
International Civil and Human Rights Advocacy
UNITED SIKHS
+1-646-315-3909

Start typing and press Enter to search

Shopping Cart
news-1701

yakinjp

yakinjp

rtp yakinjp

yakinjp

yakinjp

yakin jp

yakinjp id

maujp

maujp

maujp

\

sabung ayam online

sabung ayam online

SLOT MAHJONG

sabung ayam online

article 0000021

article 0000022

article 0000023

article 0000024

article 0000025

article 0000026

article 0000027

article 0000028

article 0000029

article 0000030

article 0000031

article 0000032

article 0000033

article 0000034

article 0000035

article 0000036

article 0000037

article 0000038

article 0000039

article 0000040

article 0000041

article 0000042

article 0000043

article 0000044

article 0000045

article 0000046

article 0000047

article 0000048

article 0000049

article 0000050

perkara 0000052

perkara 0000053

perkara 0000054

perkara 0000055

perkara 0000056

perkara 0000057

perkara 0000058

perkara 0000059

perkara 0000060

perkara 0000061

perkara 0000062

perkara 0000063

perkara 0000064

perkara 0000065

perkara 0000066

perkara 0000067

perkara 0000068

perkara 0000069

perkara 0000070

perkara 0000071

perkara 0000072

perkara 0000073

perkara 0000074

perkara 0000075

perkara 0000076

perkara 0000077

perkara 0000078

perkara 0000079

perkara 0000080

pengadilan 000051

pengadilan 000052

pengadilan 000053

pengadilan 000054

pengadilan 000055

pengadilan 000056

pengadilan 000057

pengadilan 000058

pengadilan 000059

pengadilan 000060

pengadilan 000061

pengadilan 000062

pengadilan 000063

pengadilan 000064

pengadilan 000065

pengadilan 000066

pengadilan 000067

pengadilan 000068

pengadilan 000069

pengadilan 000070

pengadilan 000071

pengadilan 000072

pengadilan 000073

pengadilan 000074

pengadilan 000075

pengadilan 000076

pengadilan 000077

pengadilan 000078

pengadilan 000079

pengadilan 000080

artikel 000000071

artikel 000000072

artikel 000000073

artikel 000000074

artikel 000000075

artikel 000000076

artikel 000000077

artikel 000000078

artikel 000000079

artikel 000000080

artikel 000000081

artikel 000000082

artikel 000000083

artikel 000000084

artikel 000000085

artikel 000000086

artikel 000000087

artikel 000000088

artikel 000000089

artikel 000000090

artikel 000000091

artikel 000000092

artikel 000000093

artikel 000000094

artikel 000000095

artikel 000000096

artikel 000000097

artikel 000000098

artikel 000000099

artikel 000000100

artikel 000000101

artikel 000000102

artikel 000000103

artikel 000000104

artikel 000000105

artikel 000000106

artikel 000000107

artikel 000000108

artikel 000000109

artikel 000000110

artikel 000000111

artikel 000000112

artikel 000000113

artikel 000000114

artikel 000000115

artikel 000000116

artikel 000000117

artikel 000000118

artikel 000000119

artikel 000000120

pemohonan 000001

pemohonan 000002

pemohonan 000003

pemohonan 000004

pemohonan 000005

pemohonan 000006

pemohonan 000007

pemohonan 000008

pemohonan 000009

pemohonan 000010

pemohonan 000011

pemohonan 000012

pemohonan 000013

pemohonan 000014

pemohonan 000015

pemohonan 000016

pemohonan 000017

pemohonan 000018

pemohonan 000019

pemohonan 000020

pemohonan 000021

pemohonan 000022

pemohonan 000023

pemohonan 000024

pemohonan 000025

pemohonan 000026

pemohonan 000027

pemohonan 000028

pemohonan 000029

pemohonan 000030

article 00000011

article 00000012

article 00000013

article 00000014

article 00000015

article 00000016

article 00000017

article 00000018

article 00000019

article 00000020

article 00000021

article 00000022

article 00000023

article 00000024

article 00000025

article 00000026

article 00000027

article 00000028

article 00000029

article 00000030

article 00000031

article 00000032

article 00000033

article 00000034

article 00000035

article 00000036

article 00000037

article 00000038

article 00000039

article 00000040

article 00000041

article 00000042

article 00000043

article 00000044

article 00000045

article 00000046

article 00000047

article 00000048

article 00000049

article 00000050

article 00000051

article 00000052

article 00000053

article 00000054

article 00000055

article 00000056

article 00000057

article 00000058

article 00000059

article 00000060

pusdataru 00010

pusdataru 00011

pusdataru 00012

pusdataru 00013

pusdataru 00014

pusdataru 00015

pusdataru 00016

pusdataru 00017

pusdataru 00018

pusdataru 00019

pusdataru 00020

pusdataru 00021

pusdataru 00022

pusdataru 00023

pusdataru 00024

pusdataru 00025

pusdataru 00026

pusdataru 00027

pusdataru 00028

pusdataru 00029

pusdataru 00030

pusdataru 00031

pusdataru 00032

pusdataru 00033

pusdataru 00034

pusdataru 00035

pusdataru 00036

pusdataru 00037

pusdataru 00038

pusdataru 00039

pusdataru 00040

pusdataru 00041

pusdataru 00042

pusdataru 00043

pusdataru 00044

pusdataru 00045

pusdataru 00046

pusdataru 00047

pusdataru 00048

pusdataru 00049

pusdataru 00050

pusdataru 00051

pusdataru 00052

pusdataru 00053

pusdataru 00054

pusdataru 00055

pusdataru 00056

pusdataru 00057

pusdataru 00058

pusdataru 00059

pusdataru 00060

article 2000001

article 2000002

article 2000003

article 2000004

article 2000005

article 2000006

article 2000007

article 2000008

article 2000009

article 2000010

article 2000011

article 2000012

article 2000013

article 2000014

article 2000015

article 2000016

article 2000017

article 2000018

article 2000019

article 2000020

article 2000021

article 2000022

article 2000023

article 2000024

article 2000025

article 2000026

article 2000027

article 2000028

article 2000029

article 2000030

article 2000031

article 2000032

article 2000033

article 2000034

article 2000035

article 2000036

article 2000037

article 2000038

article 2000039

article 2000040

article 2000041

article 2000042

article 2000043

article 2000044

article 2000045

article 2000046

article 2000047

article 2000048

article 2000049

article 2000050

article 2000051

article 2000052

article 2000053

article 2000054

article 2000055

article 2000056

article 2000057

article 2000058

article 2000059

article 2000060

invoice 00016

invoice 00017

invoice 00018

invoice 00019

invoice 00020

invoice 00021

invoice 00022

invoice 00023

invoice 00024

invoice 00025

invoice 00026

invoice 00027

invoice 00028

invoice 00029

invoice 00030

invoice 00031

invoice 00032

invoice 00033

invoice 00034

invoice 00035

invoice 00036

invoice 00037

invoice 00038

invoice 00039

invoice 00040

invoice 00041

invoice 00042

invoice 00043

invoice 00044

invoice 00045

news-1701