Posted in ICHRA

“A travesty of Justice against the Sikh community”: Mejindarpal Kaur, UNITED SIKHS legal director

“This decision will not legally affect the fight which UNITED SIKHS will be pursuing for other ID cases through the UN Human Rights Committee, as the Committee is not bound by the decision of the European Court of Human Rights. Additionally, the UN Human Rights Committee has traditionally been much more receptive to cases of religious discrimination than the Strasburg Court. We hope that tendency will continue.”: Stephen Grosz, UNITED SIKHS London based lawyer.

<< Jean-Paul Costa, president of the European Court of Human
Rights, a staunch French secularist, who was one of the 7 judges
who made the decision.

STRASBOURG, France: The European Court of Human Rights dismissed a legal challenge last week to the French law banning the wearing of the turban on ID document photos, filed by UNITED SIKHS on behalf of Shingara Mann Singh. The decision, communicated to UNITED SIKHS lawyers today, has shocked the Sikh community globally, that the Court, without requiring France to respond to Shingara Singh’s legal arguments, has justified denying religious freedom on the basis of public security and protection of public order. UNITED SIKHS is filing cases before the United Nations Human Rights Committee next month on behalf of Shingara Singh and Ranjit Singh for ID photographs on their passport and residence card, respectively.

French regulations require motorists to appear “bareheaded and facing forward” in their driver’s licence photographs. Shingara Singh is a 53 year old Sikh from the northern Paris suburbs, whose replacement driver’s licence was refused by the French authorities in 2005 and again in 2006. Sikhs are required to wear the dastaar (Sikh turban) at all times. Commenting on the decision, Mejindarpal Kaur, UNITED SIKHS Director for International Civil and Human Rights Advocacy stated, “We submitted three compelling arguments before the European Court of Human Rights: Firstly, that European Commission regulations do not require a bare head as a minimum requirement for other ID docs e.g. a passport because of the advent of biometrics; secondly, that a Sikh wears a dastaar (Sikh turban) at all times and hence is only identifiable with his turban and thirdly, that there is no evidence that the Sikh turban poses a security threat as evidenced by the fact that France allows Sikhs of other nationalities to travel through France with ID photographs displaying the turban on their driver’s licences and passports.””This decision is a travesty of justice against the Sikh community which views the Court’s decision as perverse because the Court did not require a response from France before issuing a decision that deeply interferes with a Sikh’s basic religious rights,” she added. You may read an excerpt of the translated judgment here.Shingara Singh’s London Lawyer, Stephen Grosz of Bindmans[] LLP stated, “The Court’s approach is very disappointing. Whilst it recognized that requiring a Sikh to remove his turban is an interference with his religious rights, the Court was quite wrong to justify that removal of the turban as necessary for identification. In particular, identifying a Sikh who wears a turban at all times, with an ID photograph of the Sikh without the turban just does not accord to common sense. The issue is serious enough to demand the French government to justify this restriction, which the Court did not.”Commenting on the upcoming filings on behalf of Shingara Singh and Ranjit Singh in regard to the denial of the renewal of their passport and residence card unless they remove their turban for their ID photographs, Mr. Grosz commented, “This decision will not legally affect the fight which UNITED SIKHS will be pursuing through the UN Human Rights Committee, as the Committee is not bound by the decision of the European Court of Human Rights. Additionally, the UN Human Rights Committee has traditionally been much more receptive to cases of religious discrimination than the Strasburg Court. We hope this tendency will continue.”
 
Comments from Sikh leaders on this judgment
Chain Singh, President of Bobigny Gurdwara, the largest Sikh place of worship in France: “We are living under duress under French law. Our children who are citizens of France cannot get education with their identity intact. What’s our future in France? We are deeply shocked. Our future is in the hands of the Sikh Qaum (community) now more than ever. The Sikh Qaum has to now decide the future of Sikhs globally.Gurdial Singh, who has been in the forefront of the Right to Turban campaign in France said, “This has come as a rude shock to us. We thought that we would get justice in the European court. This decision is a violation of religious freedom. This is the start of European fundamentalism. But I have full faith that the Guru will defend the Turban, if he wants us to continue wearing his turban. We are the foot-soldiers; the Guru is the general and will give us victory eventually”.Raghbir Singh: Member of Bobigny Gurdwara: This is shocking news. We had great hopes from the European Court, which has been crushed by this decision. This shows that the European Court is partial towards the French Government.Kashmir Singh, a member of the French Sikh community: I am shocked to hear this! On the one hand President Sarkozy said on his visit to India that the turban is not banned in France and that Sikhs are free to practise their religion. But where is the freedom after today’s decision?Dr. Pritpal Singh, Coordinator, American Gurudwara Prabandhak Committee “This judgment is a rude shock. They have cut us out from the tree of justice completely”Gurbax Singh Malhi, MP, Canada: “Sikhs should globally decide what the way forward should be. Sikhs are peace-loving hardworking and their turban should not be perceived as a security threat.Bhai Amrik Singh, Chair of the Sikh Federation (UK) speaking from Southampton said: ‘Whilst the decision by the European Court of Human Rights is hugely disappointing Sikhs will continue to challenge this discrimination. We will continue to exert political pressure so the Sikh identity is properly protected throughout Europe. The new pan-European credit card-style driving licence will begin in 2013 and we have in the past been given assurances by certain Members of the European Parliament (MEP) that photographs of Sikhs whilst wearing their turbans will be allowed for the new driving licence. In light of the Court’s decision we will have to maintain pressure on the MEPs on this issue.

Seriously disappointed by the decision, Shingara Singh commented, “If we can’t get justice from the European Court of Human Rights, who else can we expect justice from in Europe? We pin our hopes now on the UN Human Rights Committee before which my passport case will be filed next month. I am shocked that the European

Shingara Singh

Human Rights Court didn’t require France to respond to the submissions made by my lawyers who had argued why my turban is not a security threat.” Commenting further on the issue, he stated, “My business, my personal life are all affected. I now have no passport, no driving licence and my old-style ID card is not being accepted by my bank, which has refused to give me a loan because I lack valid identification. The Court’s judgment is oppression against the Sikh community because a Sikh is mandated by his faith to wear a turban at all times. The Court clearly has not recognised what the turban means to a Sikh. The Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC), the Sikh mini-Parliament, has a duty to launch a global awareness campaign about Sikhs. Equally, the Punjab State Government should intervene in this matter.”

Kuldip Singh, UNITED SIKHS president said, “The Sikh community, small but significant, has found itself to be at the brunt of security laws since 9/11. We have and will continue to fight the injustice faced by Sikhs and other minorities who are being denied religious freedom while the world grapples with its insecurity.”

You may read a previous UNITED SIKHS’ press release on the Right to Turban campaign at: https://unitedsikhs.org/belgian-court-overturns-ban-on-sikh-headcovering-in-school/

Issued By:
Jaspreet Singh
International Civil and Human Rights Advocacy
UNITED SIKHS
+1-646-315-3909

Start typing and press Enter to search

Shopping Cart
news-1701

sabung ayam online

yakinjp

yakinjp

rtp yakinjp

slot thailand

yakinjp

yakinjp

yakin jp

yakinjp id

maujp

maujp

maujp

maujp

slot mahjong

SGP Pools

slot mahjong

sabung ayam online

slot mahjong

SLOT THAILAND

psda 438000021

psda 438000022

psda 438000023

psda 438000024

psda 438000025

psda 438000026

psda 438000027

psda 438000028

psda 438000029

psda 438000030

psda 438000031

psda 438000032

psda 438000033

psda 438000034

psda 438000035

psda 438000036

psda 438000037

psda 438000038

psda 438000039

psda 438000040

psda 438000041

psda 438000042

psda 438000043

psda 438000044

psda 438000045

psda 438000046

psda 438000047

psda 438000048

psda 438000049

psda 438000050

psda 438000051

psda 438000052

psda 438000053

psda 438000054

psda 438000055

psda 438000056

psda 438000057

psda 438000058

psda 438000059

psda 438000060

psda 438000061

psda 438000062

psda 438000063

psda 438000064

psda 438000065

psda 438000066

psda 438000067

psda 438000068

psda 438000069

psda 438000070

psda 438000071

psda 438000072

psda 438000073

psda 438000074

psda 438000075

psda 438000076

psda 438000077

psda 438000078

psda 438000079

psda 438000080

cuaca 638000086

cuaca 638000087

cuaca 638000088

cuaca 638000089

cuaca 638000090

cuaca 638000091

cuaca 638000092

cuaca 638000093

cuaca 638000094

cuaca 638000095

cuaca 638000096

cuaca 638000097

cuaca 638000098

cuaca 638000099

cuaca 638000100

cuaca 638000101

cuaca 638000102

cuaca 638000103

cuaca 638000104

cuaca 638000105

article 710000111

article 710000112

article 710000113

article 710000114

article 710000115

article 710000116

article 710000117

article 710000118

article 710000119

article 710000120

article 710000121

article 710000122

article 710000123

article 710000124

article 710000125

article 710000126

article 710000127

article 710000128

article 710000129

article 710000130

article 710000131

article 710000132

article 710000133

article 710000134

article 710000135

article 710000136

article 710000137

article 710000138

article 710000139

article 710000140

article 710000141

article 710000142

article 710000143

article 710000144

article 710000145

article 710000146

article 710000147

article 710000148

article 710000149

article 710000150

article 710000151

article 710000152

article 710000153

article 710000154

article 710000155

article 710000156

article 710000157

article 710000158

article 710000159

article 710000160

article 999990051

article 999990052

article 999990053

article 999990054

article 999990055

article 999990056

article 999990057

article 999990058

article 999990059

article 999990060

article 999990061

article 999990062

article 999990063

article 999990064

article 999990065

article 999990066

article 999990067

article 999990068

article 999990069

article 999990070

article 999990071

article 999990072

article 999990073

article 999990074

article 999990075

cuaca 898100116

cuaca 898100117

cuaca 898100118

cuaca 898100119

cuaca 898100120

cuaca 898100121

cuaca 898100122

cuaca 898100123

cuaca 898100124

cuaca 898100125

cuaca 898100126

cuaca 898100127

cuaca 898100128

cuaca 898100129

cuaca 898100130

cuaca 898100131

cuaca 898100132

cuaca 898100133

cuaca 898100134

cuaca 898100135

cuaca 898100136

cuaca 898100137

cuaca 898100138

cuaca 898100139

cuaca 898100140

cuaca 898100141

cuaca 898100142

cuaca 898100143

cuaca 898100144

cuaca 898100145

news-1701