UK Tribunal: Kirpan Ban Justified Against Sikh Prison Officer
Posted in ICHRA

“It’s very disturbing that the Employment Tribunal Judge has ruled that the Kirpan ban was justified even though the government had agreed in principle to a proposal to allow the wearing of the Kirpan by Sikh prison staff.

Further, the judge ruled that Jagdip Singh did not have any protection under the Race Relations Act in his capacity as an initiated Sikh, which mandates him to wear the Kirpan at all times. The Judge ruled that the Kirpan ban was justified because the evidence suggests that only 10 per cent of UK Sikhs are initiated and hence the discriminatory impact on Sikhs was small.”: Mejindarpal Kaur, Legal Director of UNITED SIKHS, who was approached for help by Jagdip Singh following his dismissal for wearing his Kirpan.

I am very disappointed with the judgment because it has justified a blanket ban on the Kirpan and no Amritdhari (initiated) Sikh may ever work in any capacity in the UK Prison Service,” said Jagdip Singh, 26 year old ex prison officer who sued the Prison Service and its contractor Serco, after he was dismissed from his job for wearing a Kirpan.“It is a disappointing result and our client is considering the judgment,” said Kulvinder Kaur, solicitor representing Jagdip Singh.

Birmingham, UK – An employment tribunal ruled today (18th May 2011) that a Sikh Prison officer was not discriminated against when he was asked to remove his Kirpan, his article of faith, even though a proposal  to allow the wearing of the Kirpan had already been agreed in principle, following comprehensive consultation by the Ministry of Justice.

Employment Judge NJ Roper who delivered the reserved judgment said that Prison Service Orders, PSO 4550, were in effect a blanket ban on the wearing of a Kirpan in prisons by anyone other than a Sikh prison chaplain.

“Since 2004 the Ministry of Justice has been aware that it is necessary to balance the need for security and safety within prisons, with the need to ensure that the Prison Service is not discriminating against baptised Sikhs by excluding them from working in prisons,” Judge Roper said in the judgment.

“We have seen an e-mail from Mrs McAllister the Head of Security Group of the Prison Service dated 7 December 2004 in which she suggests “in order to balance faith needs and security considerations, but with regard to the primacy of security, it seems appropriate to move away from a blanket ban on the wearing of kirpans”, he added.

“The Kirpan is an article of faith which signifies compassion and reminds a Sikh to uphold the truth,” Jagdip Singh said in defense of his right to wear his Kirpan

The Employment Tribunal sitting in Birmingham had heard that a comprehensive consultation was carried out in 2008 by the National Offender Management Service (“NOMS”), an executive agency of the Ministry of Justice which is responsible for prison and probation matters. This included a risk analysis following which a proposal was made in January 2009, before Jagdip Singh commenced his employment s a prison officer, to approve in principle the wearing of the Kirpan by prison staff.

However, in Nov 2009, a new Director General of NOMS, Mr Wheatley, in response to an inquiry by Jagdip Singh’s MP about his dismissal, opposed the proposal.

“As at the date of this hearing, the Prison Service has not amended PSO 4550 to allow prison staff to carry the Kirpan,” noted Judge Roper.

“The Tribunal heard evidence of the risk analysis and the proposal to allow the wearing if the Kirpan by prison staff, yet the Tribunal chose to ignore the preponderance of evidence in favour of allowing the wearing of the Kirpan, “ said Mejindarpal Kaur, Legal Director of  UNITED SIKHS, who was approached for help by Jagdip Singh in 2009 following his dismissal for wearing his Kirpan.

“Judge Roper said in his judgment that an initiated Sikh is not protected from indirect discrimination under the Race Relation Act because he is not a separate and distinct class from non-initiated Sikhs. He then said that since the evidence suggests that only 10 per cent of UK Sikhs are initiated, the Kirpan ban does not discriminate the majority of Sikhs because its impact was small,” added Mejindarpal Kaur.

You may read a previous press release on UNITED SIKHS’ advocacy for Sikh articles of faith globally at https://www.unitedsikhs.org/PressReleases/PRSRLS-14-05-2011-00.html

Issued by:
Mejindarpal Kaur
Legal Director
International Civil and Human Rights Advocacy
Law-global@unitedsikhs.org
+44 (0)8701993328

Start typing and press Enter to search

Shopping Cart
news-1701

sabung ayam online

yakinjp

yakinjp

rtp yakinjp

slot thailand

yakinjp

yakinjp

yakin jp

yakinjp id

maujp

maujp

maujp

maujp

slot mahjong

SGP Pools

slot mahjong

sabung ayam online

slot mahjong

SLOT THAILAND

psda 438000021

psda 438000022

psda 438000023

psda 438000024

psda 438000025

psda 438000026

psda 438000027

psda 438000028

psda 438000029

psda 438000030

psda 438000031

psda 438000032

psda 438000033

psda 438000034

psda 438000035

psda 438000036

psda 438000037

psda 438000038

psda 438000039

psda 438000040

psda 438000041

psda 438000042

psda 438000043

psda 438000044

psda 438000045

psda 438000046

psda 438000047

psda 438000048

psda 438000049

psda 438000050

psda 438000051

psda 438000052

psda 438000053

psda 438000054

psda 438000055

psda 438000056

psda 438000057

psda 438000058

psda 438000059

psda 438000060

psda 438000061

psda 438000062

psda 438000063

psda 438000064

psda 438000065

psda 438000066

psda 438000067

psda 438000068

psda 438000069

psda 438000070

psda 438000071

psda 438000072

psda 438000073

psda 438000074

psda 438000075

psda 438000076

psda 438000077

psda 438000078

psda 438000079

psda 438000080

cuaca 638000086

cuaca 638000087

cuaca 638000088

cuaca 638000089

cuaca 638000090

cuaca 638000091

cuaca 638000092

cuaca 638000093

cuaca 638000094

cuaca 638000095

cuaca 638000096

cuaca 638000097

cuaca 638000098

cuaca 638000099

cuaca 638000100

cuaca 638000101

cuaca 638000102

cuaca 638000103

cuaca 638000104

cuaca 638000105

article 710000111

article 710000112

article 710000113

article 710000114

article 710000115

article 710000116

article 710000117

article 710000118

article 710000119

article 710000120

article 710000121

article 710000122

article 710000123

article 710000124

article 710000125

article 710000126

article 710000127

article 710000128

article 710000129

article 710000130

article 710000131

article 710000132

article 710000133

article 710000134

article 710000135

article 710000136

article 710000137

article 710000138

article 710000139

article 710000140

article 710000141

article 710000142

article 710000143

article 710000144

article 710000145

article 710000146

article 710000147

article 710000148

article 710000149

article 710000150

article 710000151

article 710000152

article 710000153

article 710000154

article 710000155

article 710000156

article 710000157

article 710000158

article 710000159

article 710000160

article 999990051

article 999990052

article 999990053

article 999990054

article 999990055

article 999990056

article 999990057

article 999990058

article 999990059

article 999990060

article 999990061

article 999990062

article 999990063

article 999990064

article 999990065

article 999990066

article 999990067

article 999990068

article 999990069

article 999990070

article 999990071

article 999990072

article 999990073

article 999990074

article 999990075

cuaca 898100116

cuaca 898100117

cuaca 898100118

cuaca 898100119

cuaca 898100120

cuaca 898100121

cuaca 898100122

cuaca 898100123

cuaca 898100124

cuaca 898100125

cuaca 898100126

cuaca 898100127

cuaca 898100128

cuaca 898100129

cuaca 898100130

cuaca 898100131

cuaca 898100132

cuaca 898100133

cuaca 898100134

cuaca 898100135

cuaca 898100136

cuaca 898100137

cuaca 898100138

cuaca 898100139

cuaca 898100140

cuaca 898100141

cuaca 898100142

cuaca 898100143

cuaca 898100144

cuaca 898100145

news-1701